What is the test for a defendant's claim that the conditions of a search and seizure warrant issued by the Court of Appeal restrict his right to privacy, speech, and association?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Maldonado, H044815 (Cal. App. 2020):

Defendant contends the challenged conditions are unconstitutionally overbroad because they are not narrowly tailored to limit their impact on his rights to privacy, speech, and association. While defendant asserts his First Amendment rights to free speech and association, he does not explain how the conditions curtail those rights. As the only right defendant discusses in any detail is his Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures, we focus our analysis there. (See Tichinin v.

Page 7

Other Questions


Does the affidavit supporting a search warrant invalidate the search warrant for a home searched for a stolen gun after the original warrant was issued? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a search warrant issued by the California Superior Court of Justice for a stop and seizure of a car in the middle of the night, and what is the effect of this search and seizure? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant bring a notice of appeal to the Court of Appeal claiming that he failed to raise his constitutional claims in the trial court? (California, United States of America)
If a search warrant was obtained during a search and seizure of a shotgun, would the search warrant be invalid as fruit of the poisonous tree? (California, United States of America)
In a motion for a search warrant issued by the Superior Court of California against Defendant in a civil matter, what is the effect of the search? (California, United States of America)
Is there any evidence that there is insufficient probable cause for the seizure of a laptop and the search warrant issued for that search warrant? (California, United States of America)
In a minor's probation application to the Court of Appeal, is the minor's claim that the search of his pockets was not justified by the search incident to arrest exception to the warrant requirement? (California, United States of America)
Does the exclusionary rule apply when an officer acting with objective good faith has obtained a search warrant for the search warrant under the Golden Gate Drive search warrant? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a valid claim to be able to claim damages from a defendant who has been found guilty of a similar claim against the Defendant? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General's claim that defendant forfeited the issue on appeal because defendant made no effort to correct the court's misperception and press for a ruling? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.