California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Rachal, H040306 (Cal. App. 2015):
Because the evidence was sufficient to support a conviction of first degree premeditated murder, we need not consider whether it also supported a conviction under a torture-murder theory or a lying-in-wait theory. Any deficiency in the evidence of alternative first degree murder theories is harmless "absent an affirmative indication in the record that the verdict actually did rest" on one of those theories. (People v. Guiton (1993) 4 Cal.4th 1116, 1129 [where case is given to jury on different factual theories, one of which is not supported by the evidence, court presumes the jurors rejected that theory and based the verdict on the factually supported theory].) The record here does not affirmatively indicate the jury relied on torture or lying in wait rather than premeditation as a basis for first degree murder.
Page 18
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.