What is the test for a claim-of-right defense?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Wiggins, A143183 (Cal. App. 2016):

"The claim-of-right defense provides that a defendant's good faith belief, even if mistakenly held, that he has a right or claim to property he takes from another negates the felonious intent necessary for conviction of theft or robbery." (People v. Tufunga (1999)

Page 10

21 Cal.4th 935, 938 (Tufunga).) "A defendant need not show his mistaken claim-of-right was reasonable. An unreasonable belief that he had a legal right to take another's property will suffice so long as he can establish his claim was made in good faith." (People v. Romo (1990) 220 Cal.App.3d 514, 518 (Romo).) " '[A] trial court is not required to instruct on a claim-of-right defense unless there is evidence to support an inference that [the defendant] acted with a subjective belief he or she had a lawful claim on the property.' " (Tufunga, supra, at p. 944.) " ' "In evaluating the evidence to determine whether a requested instruction should be given, the trial court should not measure its substantiality by weighing the credibility [of the witnesses] . . . . Doubts as to the sufficiency of the evidence to warrant instructions should be resolved in favor of the accused." ' " (Ibid.)

Other Questions


Is a mistake-of-fact defense defense defense harmless? (California, United States of America)
What is the legal test for a defense counsel to pursue an innocence defense rather than a voluntary intoxication defense? (California, United States of America)
Is the statute of limitations defense a "favored or disfavored" defense? (California, United States of America)
Can defense counsel argue that defense counsel failed to object to the foregoing procedure or request that written instructions be provided to the jury? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a defense counsel be required to rest his case without putting on a defense? (California, United States of America)
When a prosecutor asks a defense counsel a question in voir dire about rape and sexual assault, is the defense counsel's failure to object to the questions? (California, United States of America)
When will a trial court instruct the jury on the defense of unconsciousness and self-defense in a case of involuntary manslaughter? (California, United States of America)
Is a prosecutor's comment that defense counsel was seeking to "distract the jury from the evidence as an attack on counsel's integrity a fair response to defense counsel's remarks? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor have the authority to imply that defense counsel fabricated a defense? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the court require a defense counsel to object to a motion where the trial atmosphere was poisonous, and the defense counsel did not object at all? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.