The following excerpt is from E.E.O.C. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 156 F.3d 989 (9th Cir. 1998):
We recently held in Ngo v. Reno Hilton Resort Corp., 140 F.3d 1299, 1304 (9th Cir.1998), that "the language of 1981a ... require[s] plaintiffs seeking punitive damages to make a showing beyond the threshold level of intent required for compensatory liability." "An award of punitive damages under Title VII is proper where the acts of discrimination giving rise to liability are willful and egregious, or display reckless indifference to the plaintiff's federal rights." Id. (footnotes omitted) (emphasis added). Punitive damages may not be awarded, however, where a defendant's conduct is merely negligent. Id. "Thus, to be entitled to an award of punitive damages, the plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant 'almost certainly knew that what he was doing was wrongful and subject to punishment.' " Id. (citing Soderbeck v. Burnett County, Wisconsin, 752 F.2d 285, 291 (7th Cir.1985)).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.