The following excerpt is from United States v. Valente, No. 15-3912-cr (2nd Cir. 2017):
The Defendant challenges the substantive reasonableness of the sentence, but in light of our decision to remand for resentencing, we decline to address the substantive reasonableness of the sentence imposed. See, e.g., United States v. Malki, 718 F.3d 178, 181 (2d Cir. 2013) (per curiam) (declining to address substantive reasonableness in light of remand for resentencing).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.