What is the substantial evidence standard of review for circumstantial evidence?

The substantial evidence standard of review is the same for circumstantial evidence as it is for direct evidence of guilt. (People v. Holt (1997) 15 Cal.4th 619, 668.) " 'Although it is the duty of the jury to acquit a defendant if it finds that circumstantial evidence is susceptible of two interpretations, one of which suggests guilt and the other innocence [citations], it is the jury, not the appellate court which must be convinced of the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. " 'If the circumstances reasonably

Page 9