What is the state's interpretation of Section 363(1) of the California Statutory Code of Civil Procedure?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Donabedian By and Through Donabedian v. Manzer, 150 Cal.App.3d 424, 198 Cal.Rptr. 33 (Cal. App. 1984):
But nevertheless the statute, as we are told by Kite v. Campbell (1983) 142 Cal.App.3d 793, 801, 191 Cal.Rptr. 363, is "not a model of clarity." (Our emphasis.) And such confusion as is engendered by it is, we think, compounded by the many disparate opinions of the state's Courts of Appeal purporting to interpret it. We briefly discuss them.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the effect of section 31103 of the California Code of Civil Procedure on the interpretation of the Section 31103 section? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 139 of the California Civil Code, section 139 2 of the S.C. Code of Civil Procedure? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for interpretation of the California Code of Civil Procedure when it comes to the interpretation of statutory interpretation? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 213.5 of the California Code of Civil Procedure in the context of statutory interpretation? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 1054(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure, section 1054 et. seq. and section 854 of the Criminal Code, allow defense counsel to conduct their investigation and prepare for trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the state's interpretation of Section 363(1) of the California Statutory Code of Civil Procedure? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for interpreting the meaning of the word "reasonable and common sense interpretation" in the context of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act? (California, United States of America)
Is section 1161a(b) of the California Statutory Code of Civil Procedure sufficient to compel a judge to interpret the meaning of the law in its entirety? (California, United States of America)
Does the California Supreme Court have any authority or authority to amend or amend a section of the California Statutory Code of Civil Procedure to make it easier for a plaintiff to sue for damages? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the meaning of a section of the California Statutory Code of Civil Procedure requiring a cap on the amount of cannabis that can be confiscated? (California, United States of America)
