The following excerpt is from Jackman v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 15 F.3d 1085 (9th Cir. 1993):
Jackman's final contention is that the district court erred in finding that Jackman failed to establish fraud or corruption in the award. We agree with the district court and conclude that Jackman has failed to allege, much less establish, the elements necessary to establish fraud or corruption. See e.g. Stewart v. Ragland, 934 F.2d 1033, 1043 (9th Cir.1991) ("Under California law, a fraud action requires: 1) misrepresentation; 2) knowledge of the falsity of the representation; 3) intent to induce reliance; 4) justifiable reliance; and 5) damages.").
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.