What is the state of the law in dealing with conflicting testimony?
The following excerpt is from MATTER OF" DUBIN", 201 Misc. 621 (N.Y. Dist. Ct. 1952):
The parties give the lie to each other on certain facts "of such an intimate character that necessarily the direct testimony must be oath against oath" (Risk v. Risk, 202 App. Div. 299, 302); and no useful purpose would be served by a detailed narrative of their conflicting testimony and that of the several other witnesses. Suffice it to state the following conclusions, reached after reflection upon all the evidence (including the demeanor of the parties) and the letter-briefs of counsel:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
