The following excerpt is from Singh v. Barr, 18-362 NAC (2nd Cir. 2020):
Finally, the agency reasonably concluded that Singh's documentary evidence did not rehabilitate his credibility. See Biao Yang v. Gonzales, 496 F.3d 268, 273 (2d Cir. 2007) ("An applicant's failure to corroborate his . . . testimony may bear on credibility, because the absence of corroboration in general makes an applicant unable to rehabilitate testimony that has already been called into question"). As discussed previously, the letters Singh submitted were inconsistent with his testimony regarding the dates of particular incidents and the duration of his hospital stays. Further, an additional letter from Singh's political party
Page 7
did not address, and thus did not corroborate, his allegations of past harm.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.