The following excerpt is from Younan v. Rolls-Royce Corp., CASE NO. 09cv2136-WQH-BGS (S.D. Cal. 2013):
"The existence and scope of a duty are questions of law for the court's determination." Ericson v. Fed. Exp. Corp., 162 Cal. App. 4th 1291, 1300 (2008) (citation omitted); see also In re Air Crash Disaster Near Cerritos, Cal., 973 F.2d 1490, 1496-97 (9th Cir. 1992) ("Whether a defendant owes a duty of care is a question of law.") (applying California law). MDHI moves for a ruling that federal law preempts any state-law duty to warn in this case.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.