What is the standard of review of motions made pursuant to People v. Marsden?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Alfaro, B256607 (Cal. App. 2015):

Defendant contends that the trial court abused its discretion in denying his numerous motions made pursuant to People v. Marsden, supra, 2 Cal.3d 118. We disagree.

1. Standard of Review

Other Questions


What is the standard for appellate review of a motion to suppress pursuant to section 1538.5? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review of a motion by the Court of Appeal for a motion to overturn a finding of not guilty? (California, United States of America)
How should the Court of Appeal review the first-stage ruling of a motion to review the denial of Batson/Wheeler motion? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing a ruling on an anti-SLAPP motion, how do we review an order granting or denying a motion to strike under section 425.16 de novo? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing a motion for a new trial, does the appellate court apply the standard of "abuse of discretion" in denying the motion? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for reviewing a motion where new evidence has been discovered during a trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for a motion to review a decision of a trial court? (California, United States of America)
On appeal, what is the standard of review in the context of a motion for summary review of the facts of the case? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard for appellate review of a motion to suppress pursuant to section 1538.5? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard for appellate review of a motion to suppress pursuant to section 1538.5? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.