What is the standard of review of evidence to support a finding of gang membership?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Garcia, H043355 (Cal. App. 2018):

" 'On appeal we review the whole record in the light most favorable to the judgment to determine whether it discloses substantial evidencethat is, evidence that is reasonable, credible, and of solid valuefrom which a reasonable trier of fact could find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. [Citations.]' " (People v. Cravens (2012) 53 Cal.4th 500, 507.) The same standard applies to our review of evidence to support a gang allegation finding. (People v. Catlin (2001) 26 Cal.4th 81, 139.)

Other Questions


Does the evidence support the finding that there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that the sexual assault charges against Backman were not supported by the weight of the evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the evidence that supports the argument that the evidence supports the proposition that there is no evidence supporting the claim? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review of evidence to support a finding of gang membership? (California, United States of America)
What is the evidence supporting the finding that there is insufficient evidence to support the findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
What is the substantial evidence test in the review of a finding under the preponderance of the evidence standard? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing the sufficiency of evidence supporting a conviction, what is the standard of review? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing for the sufficiency of evidence to support a conviction, how does the court review the evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the substantial evidence test in the review of a finding under the preponderance of the evidence standard? (California, United States of America)
When the evidence is sufficient to sustain some but not all alleged damages, when the evidence does not support all of the damages, will the court reduce the judgment to the amount supported by the evidence? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing the sufficiency of evidence to support the conviction, how does the court review the evidence? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.