What is the standard of review of a motion to suppress?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Linares, E068808 (Cal. App. 2019):

"The standard of review . . . of a trial court's ruling on a motion to suppress is well-established. We defer to the trial court's factual findings, express or implied, where supported by substantial evidence," and we review the legal conclusions de novo, exercising our independent judgment. (People v. Glaser (1995) 11 Cal.4th 354, 362.)

Other Questions


On appeal from a denial of a motion to suppress, what is the standard on appeal from the denial of the suppress motion? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing a denial of suppression motion, what is the effect of the finding of reasonableness of the officer's conduct in denying suppression motion? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing a motion to suppress, what is the test for determining whether a motion can be suppressed? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for a motion to suppress or suppress evidence? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing a finding on a suppression motion, what are the implications of the trial court's ruling on the suppression motion? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review of a motion to suppress evidence? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing a denial of a suppression motion on appeal, how do we review the findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of appellate review of a motion to suppress? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of appellate review of a motion to suppress? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of appellate review of a motion to suppress? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.