What is the standard of review for questions concerning admissibility of evidence in a federal condemnation proceeding?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from U.S. v. 57.09 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate in Skamania County, State of Wash., 757 F.2d 1025 (9th Cir. 1985):
The standard of review for questions of law is de novo. United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1201 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, --- U.S. ---, 105 S.Ct. 101, 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984). Review of questions concerning admissibility of evidence in a federal condemnation proceeding is under an abuse of discretion standard. United States v. 55.22 Acres of Land, 411 F.2d 432, 434 (9th Cir.1969).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How is the admission of evidence pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) reviewed? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In a federal habeas review of a claim of insufficiency of evidence in a criminal case, what are the requirements for the federal court to consider all evidence? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for admissible evidence in federal criminal proceedings? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a federal judge after reviewing the record in the process of making a de novo determination, have doubts concerning the credibility findings of a federal magistrate? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the effect of a federal action for non-federal action in which a plaintiff is seeking to force a federal judge to dismiss the federal action? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is patent unreasonableness the appropriate standard in reviewing evidence at a review of a severe and prolonged disability analysis? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
In a federal habeas proceeding concerning a state prisoner, is a federal court required to presume that a state court's factual findings are correct? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In a federal habeas review of a claim of insufficient evidence, what is the meaning of the phrase "all evidence must be considered in the light of the prosecution"? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a federal district court's interpretation of a federal statute a de novo review of the interpretation of the federal statute? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a federal district court's interpretation of a federal statute a de novo review of the interpretation of the federal statute? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
