What is the standard of review for ineffective assistance counsel?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Alcala v. Woodford, 334 F.3d 862 (9th Cir. 2003):
We stated the standard of review for ineffective assistance of counsel and for district and state court findings of fact in the pre-AEDPA case Silva v. Woodford, 279 F.3d 825 (9th Cir.2002):
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the scope of federal habeas review of a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In a motion to reopen, which is based on ineffective assistance of counsel, does the petitioner have to prove that his previous attorney was ineffective in any way? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is ineffective assistance an ineffective assistance claim? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is ineffective counsel ineffective assistance under the Sixth Amendment? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is ineffective assistance of counsel de novo ineffective in denying a writ of habeas corpus? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts reviewed ineffective assistance of counsel claims? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can ineffective assistance counsel be reviewed in a habeas corpus proceeding? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for review of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the state of the law in relation to the strategic decisions of counsel in the context of a claim of ineffective assistance on habeas review? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is ineffective assistance of counsel cognizable as a denial of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
