What is the standard of review applied in a sexual assault case where the prosecution relied primarily on circumstantial evidence and to special circumstance allegations?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Jones, D065740 (Cal. App. 2015):

" 'In reviewing a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, we do not determine the facts ourselves. Rather, we "examine the whole record in the light most favorable to the judgment to determine whether it discloses substantial evidenceevidence that is reasonable, credible and of solid valuesuch that a reasonable trier of fact could find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt." [Citations.] We presume in support of the judgment the existence of every fact the trier could reasonably deduce from the evidence. [Citation.] [] The same standard of review applies to cases in which the prosecution relies primarily on circumstantial evidence and to special circumstance allegations. [Citation.] "[I]f the circumstances reasonably justify the jury's findings, the judgment may not be reversed simply because the circumstances might also reasonably be reconciled with a contrary finding." [Citation.] We do not reweigh evidence or reevaluate a witness's credibility.' [Citations.] 'Resolution of conflicts and inconsistencies in the testimony is the exclusive province of the trier of fact. [Citation.] Moreover, unless the testimony is physically impossible or inherently improbable, testimony of a single witness is sufficient to support a conviction.' " (People v. Brown (2014) 59 Cal.4th 86, 105-106.)

Other Questions


What is the standard of review applied in a sexual assault case where the prosecution relies primarily on circumstantial evidence and to special circumstance allegations? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review in a sexual assault case where the prosecution relies primarily on circumstantial evidence and to special circumstance allegations? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review in a sexual assault case where the prosecution relies primarily on circumstantial evidence and to special circumstance allegations? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review in a sexual assault case where the prosecution relies primarily on circumstantial evidence and to special circumstance allegations? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review in a sexual assault case where the prosecution relies primarily on circumstantial evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review in a sexual assault case where the prosecution relies primarily on circumstantial evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review in a sexual assault case where the prosecution relies primarily on circumstantial evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review in a sexual assault case where the prosecution relies primarily on circumstantial evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review in a sexual assault case where the prosecution relies primarily on circumstantial evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review in a sexual assault case where the prosecution relies mainly on circumstantial evidence? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.