What is the standard for reviewing the denial of a motion to dissolve an injunction?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Brewer, 185 Cal.Rptr.3d 104, 235 Cal.App.4th 122 (Cal. App. 2015):

The standard for reviewing the denial of a motion to dissolve an injunction is abuse of discretion. It is a rule so universally followed and so often stated as to need only to be referred to that the granting, denial, dissolving or refusing to dissolve a permanent or preliminary injunction rests in the sound discretion of the trial court upon a consideration of all the particular circumstances of each individual case and will not be modified or dissolved on appeal except for an abuse of discretion. [Citation.] (Salazar v. Eastin (1995) 9 Cal.4th 836, 849850, [39 Cal.Rptr.2d 21, 890 P.2d 43].)

Other Questions


Can a motion to dissolve an injunction be reviewed on appeal from an order denying the motion? (California, United States of America)
How should the Court of Appeal review the first-stage ruling of a motion to review the denial of Batson/Wheeler motion? (California, United States of America)
On appeal from a denial of a motion to suppress, what is the standard on appeal from the denial of the suppress motion? (California, United States of America)
What are the requirements for a writ of prohibition to review a motion for review of a denial of the 995 motion? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing a denial of a motion to suppress, what is the effect of the denial on the denial to suppress? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for a motion of appeal against a denial of a new trial motion? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review used in determining whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain a conviction or support a denial of a section 1118.1 motion? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of abuse of discretion in the appellate review of the denial of Romero motions? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review in determining whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain a conviction or support the denial of a section 1118.1 motion? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing a denial of suppression motion, what is the effect of the finding of reasonableness of the officer's conduct in denying suppression motion? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.