California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Sanchez, D070713 (Cal. App. 2017):
Thus, the standard for determining whether reasonable suspicion exists is an objective one. "[I]t does not turn either on the subjective thought processes of the officer or on whether the officer is truthful about the reason for the stop." (United States v. Magallon-Lopez (9th Cir. 2016) 817 F.3d 671, 675.) "If, for example, the facts provide . . . reasonable suspicion to justify a traffic stop, the stop is lawful even if the officer made the stop only because he wished to investigate a more serious offense." (Ibid.) "[T]he objective facts are what matter in situations like these . . . ." (Ibid.) "The
Page 23
motivations of the officer are irrelevant to the reasonableness of a traffic stop under the Fourth Amendment." (People v. Suff (2014) 58 Cal.4th 1013, 1054.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.