What is the standard for determining that no rational trier of fact could have found a supplemental petition without a reasonable doubt?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Charles G., In re, 156 Cal.Rptr. 832, 95 Cal.App.3d 62 (Cal. App. 1979):

3 We would reach the same conclusion following the standard set out in Jackson v. Virginia (1979) --- U.S. ----, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 60 L.Ed.2d ---. We would not conclude in the instant case that no rational trier of fact could have found true the allegations of the supplemental petition beyond a reasonable doubt. (See Jackson --- U.S. at p. ----, 99 S.Ct. 2781.)

Other Questions


What is the standard for determining whether a rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found the essential elements of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found a defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law in which a jury has found that any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the relevant inquiry in determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found a defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found a defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard for determining that no reasonable trier of fact could find a burglary allegation true beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.