California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Arato v. Avedon, 23 Cal.Rptr.2d 131, 5 Cal.4th 1172, 858 P.2d 598 (Cal. 1993):
In reckoning the scope of disclosure, the physician will for the most part be guided by the patient's decisional needs--or, as we said in Cobbs v. Grant, supra, "the test for determining whether a potential peril must be divulged is its materiality to the patient's decision." (8 Cal.3d at p. 245, 104 Cal.Rptr. 505, 502 P.2d 1.) A physician, however, evaluates the patient's decisional needs against a background of professional understanding that includes a knowledge of what information beyond the significant risks associated with a given treatment would be regarded by the medical community as appropriate for disclosure under the circumstances.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.