What is the scope of appellant's ineffective assistance of counsel argument?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Francel, F071399 (Cal. App. 2016):

Having considered the full scope of appellant's argument on appeal and having found no abuse of discretion, we need not reach his ineffective assistance of counsel argument. (People v. O'Malley (2016) 62 Cal.4th 944, 1010, fn. 12.)

Other Questions


What is the record of the appellant's appeal against a finding that counsel provided ineffective assistance and ineffective assistance to counsel? (California, United States of America)
Is ineffective assistance to counsel ineffective assistance of counsel? (California, United States of America)
Does appellant make an ineffective assistance of counsel argument in his opening brief? (California, United States of America)
Is ineffective assistance ineffective assistance based on a trial counsel's failure to object to a restitution order? (California, United States of America)
Is ineffective assistance the burden of proving ineffective assistance of counsel? (California, United States of America)
Is there any merit to appellant's contention that the failure of trial counsel to object denied appellant the effective assistance of counsel? (California, United States of America)
Is ineffective assistance of counsel ineffective assistance on appeal? (California, United States of America)
Does a motion for a new trial on ineffective assistance of counsel fail to address the issue of ineffective assistance? (California, United States of America)
What is the substance of appellant's argument to forestall his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel? (California, United States of America)
Is ineffective assistance of counsel ineffective when counsel fails to object to the issue? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.