What is the scope of a prosecutor's argument to the jury that a defendant's good character and his religious devotion are to be considered in aggravation?

The prosecutor's comments did not suggest to the jury that these facts were to be considered in aggravation. Rather, the remarks were an appropriate response to defendant's previous testimony as to his good character and, in particular, as to his religious devotion. A defendant who offers evidence of his or her good character widens the scope of the evidence of bad character that may be introduced in rebuttal. (People v. Noguera, supra, 4 Cal.4th 599, 644, 15 Cal.Rptr.2d 400, 842 P.2d 1160.) "The scope of rebuttal legitimately embraces argument by the prosecutor 'suggesting a more balanced picture of [the accused's] personality.' [Citation.]" (Ibid.) The argument was proper.