The following excerpt is from Yu-Ling Teng v. Dist. Dir., U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Servs., 820 F.3d 1106 (9th Cir. 2016):
5 Under the revised regime, federal courts do retain some narrow authority to participate in the naturalization process. For example, the courts can administer oaths of allegiance, 8 U.S.C. 1421(b)(1), and can assert jurisdiction over a naturalization petition if the executive branch fails to act on an application within 120 days of the applicant's interview with the executive branch. See 8 U.S.C. 1447(b) ; United States v. Hovsepian, 359 F.3d 1144, 115960 (9th Cir.2004) (en banc).
5 Under the revised regime, federal courts do retain some narrow authority to participate in the naturalization process. For example, the courts can administer oaths of allegiance, 8 U.S.C. 1421(b)(1), and can assert jurisdiction over a naturalization petition if the executive branch fails to act on an application within 120 days of the applicant's interview with the executive branch. See 8 U.S.C. 1447(b) ; United States v. Hovsepian, 359 F.3d 1144, 115960 (9th Cir.2004) (en banc).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.