What is the risk of undue prejudice if a defendant has been convicted of a criminal offence based on gang evidence?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Williams, B281118 (Cal. App. 2018):

"[G]ang evidence, even if relevant, can be '"highly inflammatory."' [Citations.]" (People v. Simon (2016) 1 Cal.5th 98, 125.) The risk of undue prejudice arises when the evidence of guilt is weak, as "a jury not otherwise convinced beyond a reasonable doubt of the defendant's involvement might use gang evidence to tip the scales and convict . . . . [Citation.]" (Id. at p. 126.) However, the prejudicial effect of relevant gang evidence is dispelled where the case against the defendant is strong. (Ibid.)

Other Questions


Is a criminal offence punishable by multiple convictions for multiple offences punishable by the same criminal offence against the same defendant concurrent with one criminal offence? (California, United States of America)
When sentencing a criminal defendant for a prior felony conviction is not based on his prior criminal conviction but on his constitutional rights? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have to provide a record of criminal convictions and a history of criminal activity with respect to criminal convictions? (California, United States of America)
Does the use of evidence of criminal street gang activity by a defendant to establish a predicate offence in a prosecution for active participation in a criminal gang constitute prejudicial or prejudicial evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for reversal of a conviction under section 186.22 of the California Criminal Code when a defendant has been convicted of a charge of criminal activity committed for the benefit of a criminal street gang? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a witness has a criminal conviction for a previous criminal conviction that was impeaching the same criminal offence? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant is accused of a sexual offence in a criminal action in which he is also accused of another sexual offence, is evidence of his disposition to commit such crimes considered to be inadmissible under California Evidence Code section 1108? (California, United States of America)
Does the identity of a defendant's prior criminal convictions preclude the use of those prior convictions as evidence at trial of the same criminal charges? (California, United States of America)
When a criminal defendant contends the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction, how does the Court review the evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant has been convicted of a prior criminal offence and therefore must proceed further to determine the conduct underlying the conviction? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.