What is the " ripeness requirement" in the context of the California Court of Appeal's decision on a request for a judicial review of an application for a temporary injunction?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Siskiyou Cnty. Water Users Ass'n v. Natural Res. Agency, C068829 (Cal. App. 2012):
"The ripeness requirement[] [is] a branch of the doctrine of justiciability, [which] prevents courts from issuing purely advisory opinions." (Pacific Legal Foundation v. California Coastal Com. (1982) 33 Cal.3d 158, 170.) It requires a set of facts that are no longer speculative, and the consideration of any hardship that would result in withholding judicial review of them. (Id. at p. 171.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for a motion to review an order from the Superior Court of Appeal against a motion of appeal against an order requiring the Court to review the order? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for judicial review of the Court of Appeal's decision not to interfere with the Court on appeal? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard for a judicial review of a decision by the California Superior Court of Appeal? (California, United States of America)
Is the California Court of Appeal's review of the California Fire and Rescue Service's policy review procedure properly circumscribed? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a judicial review of a decision by the California Court of Appeal that invalidates an individual's right to a retirement plan? (California, United States of America)
In an appeal from the Court of Appeal against the decision not to grant a preliminary injunction, what is the scope of the application? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a judicial review of a decision by the California Court of Appeal that invalidates a plaintiff's right to retire age discrimination? (California, United States of America)
How have we dealt with the issue of timely appeal from the Court of Appeal in the context of an order requiring a timely appeal? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing a decision by the Superior Court of Appeal to deny probation to a defendant who has committed a criminal offence, can the judge rely on another court's decision not to grant probation? (California, United States of America)
What are the implications of the Court of Appeal's decision not to grant defendant's appeal against his conviction for contempt of court? (California, United States of America)
