What is the relevant case authority interpreting the three strikes resentencing statute?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Padilla, B257408 (Cal. App. 2015):

As appellant acknowledges, the case authority interpreting the three strikes resentencing statute ( 1170.126) provides guidance regarding his contentions. Under that statute, a defendant sentenced as a three strike offender may petition for recall of the sentence and for resentence, but is subject to eligibility criteria for which the statute sets forth no determination procedure or standard of proof. ( 1170.126, subd. (e).) Numerous decisions interpreting that provision have concluded that when certain eligibility facts have not been resolved by the verdicts or special findings rendered at trial, the trial court may independently examine the record of conviction in order to make determinations regarding those facts. (People v. Hicks (2014) 231 Cal.App.4th 275, 286 (Hicks); People v. Brimmer (2014) 230 Cal.App.4th 782, 799-801; Bradford, supra, 227 Cal.App.4th at

Page 19

Other Questions


What is the effect of the Supreme Court's interpretation of the Three Strikes statute? (California, United States of America)
How has the Court interpreted the "three strikes" statute? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant currently serving a three strike sentence for a crime no longer subject to the third strike penalty permitted to petition for resentencing? (California, United States of America)
After striking two of three prior felony convictions alleged as strikes, can a judge strike again? (California, United States of America)
When an agency adopts a new interpretation of a statute and rejects an old interpretation of the statute? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have any authority to strike a prior conviction for Three Strikes? (California, United States of America)
Does section 1192.7(c)(7) of the California Three Strikes Act, or does the Attorney General's interpretation of section 667.5(c))(7(b)(7)? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the meaning of the Three Strikes law in the context of reduced sentences for "heroic acts"? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted "three strikes" legislation? (California, United States of America)
Does the rule against interpreting statutory language "in a manner that would render some part of the statute surplusage" support a different interpretation? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.