What is the reasonable time in which a demand must be made?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Kirschenmann v. Bender, F066714 (Cal. App. 2014):
Kirschenmann asserts that the reasonable time in which a demand must be made is not always dictated by the statute of limitations. Rather, the reasonable time depends on the circumstances of each case. It is only in the absence of such circumstances that a time coincident with the running of the statute of limitations will be deemed the reasonable time. (Stafford v. Oil Tool Corp., supra, 133 Cal.App.2d at p. 766.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for evidence that the appellant could reasonably reasonably reasonably expect the appellant to have knowledge of a crime? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between a reasonable and unreasonable plaintiff and a reasonable plaintiff under a "reasonable implied assumption of risk" approach? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a reasonable probability of a more favourable result under the reasonable beyond reasonable doubt standard? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden on a plaintiff to prove that a Defendant has made a reasonable and reasonable offer under section 998 of the California Civil Code? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a prosecutor to make a statement that a reasonable doubt is reasonable? (California, United States of America)
Does the absence of an instruction defining reasonable doubt result in a jury failing to apply the same reasonable doubt test? (California, United States of America)
Is reasonable cause reasonable cause sufficient to warrantless arrest? (California, United States of America)
What is the reasonableness of showing photographs to an eye-witness for the purpose of possible identification of the perpetrator of a crime where an arrest has not yet been made? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the rule of reasonableness in the context of the reasonable use doctrine? (California, United States of America)
Is the reasonable doubt instruction insufficient to support the definition of reasonable doubt in CALCRIM No. 220? (California, United States of America)
