What is the procedural background to a motion of appeal against a conviction for sexual assault against a defendant who was found guilty on the basis of prejudicially admitted hearsay evidence?

^2. This is the second time this matter has been before this court. In 2017, a panel of this court reversed defendant's convictions on grounds the trial court prejudicially admitted hearsay evidence. (People v. Rojas (June 28, 2017, No. H043116) [nonpub. opn.].) Our summary of the procedural background includes some information set forth in our prior opinion. The facts are fully set forth in that opinion. Because they are not relevant to the instant appeal, we do not repeat them here.