What is the "one third the midterm rule" under section 1170.1?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Reyes, B277398 (Cal. App. 2017):
3. "The one-third-the-midterm rule of section 1170.1, subdivision (a), only applies to a consecutive sentence, not a sentence stayed under section 654." (People v. Cantrell (2009) 175 Cal.App.4th 1161, 1164.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the effect of the one third-the-midterm rule of section 1170.1, subdivision (a) under section 654 of the California Criminal Code when applying to stay a sentence under Section 654? (California, United States of America)
Does the one-third-the-midterm rule of section 1170.1, subdivision (a) apply to a sentence stayed under section 654? (California, United States of America)
Does the one-third-the-midterm rule apply to a sentence stayed under section 654? (California, United States of America)
How have courts considered section 954 of the Criminal Code when sentencing a defendant under section 654 under Section 654? (California, United States of America)
Can Respondents who have not been charged with violating a section of the obscenity ordinance, such as the "obscene" section, attack the section in the disjunctive? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a section 654 section 54 ruling? (California, United States of America)
Does the application of "ordinary rules of evidence" such as section 352 of California Evidence Code section 352 violate a defendant's constitutional rights? (California, United States of America)
Does section 667 of the California Criminal Code prohibit the District Attorney from invoking section 654 of the Criminal Code to strike a prior conviction enhancement under Section 667? (California, United States of America)
Does the one-third-the-midterm rule apply to a consecutive sentence? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant manipulate the rule of rule 31(d) to bypass the statutory certificate requirement under section 1237.5 of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
