What is the minimum parole eligibility period prescribed by section 667.7, subdivision (a)(1) of the California Criminal Code?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Miranda, 11 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1473, 121 Cal.Rptr.3d 231, 192 Cal.App.4th 398, 2011 Daily Journal D.A.R. 17 (Cal. App. 2011):

The third alternative in section 667(e)(2)(A)(iii) uses virtually identical language to the minimum parole eligibility period prescribed by section 667.7, subdivision (a)(1) for infliction of great bodily injury by defendants who had served two prior separate prison terms. The statute provides the minimum parole eligibility shall be "20 years, or the term determined by the court pursuant to Section 1170 for the underlying conviction, including any enhancement applicable under Chapter 4.5 (commencing with Section 1170) of Title 7 of Part 2, or any period prescribed by Section 190 or 3046, whichever is greatest." ( 667.7(a)(1); italics added.) 6 Like section 667(e)(2)(A) presently before us, section 667.7(a)(1) gives the trial court three alternatives to calculate the longest minimum parole eligibility date: "(1) 20 years, (2) the period equal to the hypothetical determinate term that would be imposed under section 1170 *416 (if the qualifying conviction is one that otherwise would be punishable under 1170); [citation], or (3) the 'period prescribed by Section 190 or 3046' (if the qualifying conviction is murder or any other offense that otherwise, independently of section 667.7, would be punishable by a life sentence)." ( People v. Jenkins (1995) 10 Cal.4th 234, 243, 40 Cal.Rptr.2d 903, 893 P.2d 1224 ( Jenkins.)

Other Questions


Can a defendant be found to have committed a single physical act for purposes of section 654 of the California Criminal Code, Section 215 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 422 of the Criminal Code for carjacking? (California, United States of America)
Does section 27 of the California Criminal Code, section 778a, subdivision (a)(1) of the Criminal Code of California apply to a defendant who is charged with a charge of conspiracy to commit a crime committed outside of the state? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between Section 667.5, subdivision (b) of the California Criminal Code and section 667, subdivision 5, of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 669, subdivision (a) of the California Criminal Code, section 669 of the Criminal Code apply to a life sentence for a convicted rapist who has been sentenced to life in prison without a chance of parole? (California, United States of America)
Does section 667 of the California Criminal Code prohibit the District Attorney from invoking section 654 of the Criminal Code to strike a prior conviction enhancement under Section 667? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be punished under section 654 of the California Criminal Code for failing to comply with the requirements of Section 654, subdivision (a) of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does section 654, subdivision (a) of the California Criminal Code, Section 654 of the Criminal Code protect a defendant against prosecution for an act or omission committed during a course of conduct deemed to be indivisible in time? (California, United States of America)
What are the consequences of section 245, subdivision (a)(1) of the California Criminal Code when it comes to section 2 and 3 of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General's sentencing error under section 667.5, subdivision (a) of the California Criminal Code apply to recidivism enhancements under sections 667 and 667 of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Is a criminal offence punishable by section 654 (a) of the Criminal Code of Ontario's Criminal Code punishable by Section 654, subdivision (a), punishable by the same law, punishable by a different law? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.