What is the limitation on the trial court's power to dismiss a prior felony conviction for purposes of section 667, subdivision (e)(1) of the California Criminal Code?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Bailey, 37 Cal.App.4th 871, 44 Cal.Rptr.2d 205 (Cal. App. 1995):

Therefore, any limitation on the trial court's power to dismiss a prior felony conviction for purposes of section 667, subdivision (e)(1) must be found in subdivision (f)(2) of that statute. The parties assume subdivision (f)(2) permits the trial court to dismiss a prior conviction in the interests of justice only on motion of the prosecutor and not on the court's own motion. If this is the correct interpretation of subdivision (f)(2), then that provision is unconstitutional as a violation of the separation of powers clause of the California Constitution. (See discussion below.) However, "[s]tatutes are to be so construed, if their language permits, as to render them valid and constitutional rather than invalid and unconstitutional." (Erlich v. Municipal [41 Cal.App.4th 768] Court (1961) 55 Cal.2d 553, 558, 11 Cal.Rptr. 758, 360 P.2d 334.) I believe subdivision (f)(2) can be given a constitutional construction.

Other Questions


What is the limitation on the trial court's power to dismiss a prior felony conviction for purposes of section 667? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant punished under section 667, subdivision (a) of the California Criminal Code because he was convicted of having committed a new serious felony after suffering a prior serious felony conviction? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be found to have committed a single physical act for purposes of section 654 of the California Criminal Code, Section 215 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 422 of the Criminal Code for carjacking? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of section 654 of the Criminal Code of Ontario's Criminal Code when a court finds that a conviction is subject to the provisions of Section 654, subdivision (a) of the Act of the Court of Justice? (California, United States of America)
Does section 667 of the California Criminal Code prohibit the District Attorney from invoking section 654 of the Criminal Code to strike a prior conviction enhancement under Section 667? (California, United States of America)
For the purposes of section 1202.4, subdivision (f) of the California Criminal Code, how have courts interpreted the meaning of the term "criminal conduct" in the context of a criminal conviction? (California, United States of America)
For the purposes of section 1202.4, subdivision (f) of the California Criminal Code, how have courts interpreted the meaning of the term "criminal conduct" in the context of a criminal conviction? (California, United States of America)
When a convicted criminal has completed his sentence for a conviction for a crime committed under section 1170.18, subdivision (f) of the California Criminal Code, can the conviction be reduced to a misdemeanor? (California, United States of America)
Does section 27 of the California Criminal Code, section 778a, subdivision (a)(1) of the Criminal Code of California apply to a defendant who is charged with a charge of conspiracy to commit a crime committed outside of the state? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 1170.15 of the California Criminal Code apply when a defendant is convicted of a felony (the first felony) and also convicted of dissuading or attempting to dissuade a victim of the first felony? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.