The following excerpt is from City and County of San Francisco v. Market St. Ry. Co., 98 F.2d 628 (9th Cir. 1938):
The second limitation mentioned in Lawton v. Steele, supra, has been stated in a number of ways. The means employed must have a real and substantial relation to,5 and must have some fair tendency to accomplish or aid in the accomplishment of6 the ends sought. On the other hand, if the means chosen are arbitrary and unreasonable,7 capricious,8 or beyond the necessities of the case,9 then the Fourteenth Amendment is violated, and it is the duty of the federal courts to declare the statute, ordinance, order or regulation void.10
[98 F.2d 633]
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.