California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Guerra, B275889 (Cal. App. 2017):
which she acknowledges is permissible. Defendant asserts the weapons condition is unreasonable under section 1203.1 because her offense did not involve any weapons or violence. She also claims the condition is overbroad because it "unduly restricts [her] Second Amendment right to bear arms," which she understands to encompass a right to possess weapons generally, not just firearms. We conclude defendant has forfeited both arguments because she did not object to the weapons condition at the time of sentencing. (People v. Welch (1993) 5 Cal.4th 228, 237.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.