What is the legal test for the exclusion of defense evidence?

The trial court's determination whether evidence has sufficient relevance to be admitted is reviewed for abuse of discretion. (People v. Sanders (1995) 11 Cal.4th 475, 554-555.) "As a general matter, the '[a]pplication of the ordinary rules of evidence . . . does not impermissibly infringe on a defendant's [due process] right to present a defense.' [Citation.] Although completely excluding evidence of an accused's defense theoretically could rise to [that] level, excluding defense evidence on a minor or subsidiary point does not . . . . Accordingly, absent such a complete exclusion, the proper

Page 10

standard of review for erroneous exclusion of defense evidence is whether it is reasonably probable the jury would have reached a more favorable verdict had the evidence been admitted. (People v. Fudge (1995) 7 Cal.4th 1075, 1102-1104.)