What is the legal test for overturning a conviction where the evidence is based primarily on circumstantial evidence?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Mitchell, D052970 (Cal. App. 9/25/2009), D052970 (Cal. App. 2009):

"In addressing a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence supporting a conviction, the reviewing court must examine the whole record in the light most favorable to the judgment to determine whether it discloses substantial evidence evidence that is reasonable, credible and of solid value such that a reasonable trier of fact could find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. [Citation.] The appellate court presumes in support of the judgment the existence of every fact the trier could reasonably deduce from the evidence. [Citations.] The same standard applies when the conviction rests primarily on circumstantial evidence. [Citation.] Although it is the jury's duty to acquit a defendant if it finds the circumstantial evidence susceptible of two reasonable interpretations, one of which suggests guilt and the other innocence, it is the jury, not the appellate court that must be convinced of the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. [Citation.] `"If the circumstances reasonably justify the trier of fact's findings, the opinion of the reviewing court that the circumstances might also reasonably be reconciled with a contrary finding does not warrant a reversal of the judgment."'" (People v. Kraft (2000) 23 Cal.4th 978, 1053-1054; see also People v. Ceja (1993) 4 Cal.4th 1134, 1139.)

Other Questions


What is the legal test for overturning a conviction where the evidence supporting the conviction rests primarily on circumstantial evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the legal test for overturning a conviction for assault where the evidence is based primarily on circumstantial evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the legal test for sufficiency of evidence to support a conviction where the evidence is based primarily on circumstantial evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the legal test for overturning a conviction when the conviction rests primarily on circumstantial evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the legal test for overturning a sexual assault conviction based primarily on circumstantial evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the legal test for overturning a conviction for sexual assault based solely on circumstantial evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the legal test for overturning a sexual assault conviction based solely on circumstantial evidence? (California, United States of America)
When a conviction for sexual assault is based primarily on circumstantial evidence, does the court have to presume every fact the trier could reasonably deduce from the evidence? (California, United States of America)
When will a court overturn a conviction for unlawful possession of a controlled substance based primarily on circumstantial evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the legal test for overturning a sexual assault conviction based solely on circumstantial evidence? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.