What is the legal test for filing a motion for relief from default within a reasonable time?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Hwang v. Chu, E063659 (Cal. App. 2016):

First, she argues the motion was not filed within a reasonable time as a matter of law. She claims that a "reasonable time" is limited to six months after discovery of the default. She cites Schenkel v. Resnik, supra, 27 Cal.App.4th Supp. 1, but Schenkel does not support her position. Code of Civil Procedure section 473.5, as discussed, has both a reasonable time requirement and an outside limit of two years. Code of Civil Procedure section 473, subdivision (b) dealing with relief from default based on mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect has both a reasonable time requirement and an outside limit of six months. Schenkel held that a "reasonable time" as used in Code of Civil Procedure section 473.5 means the same thing as a "reasonable time" as used in Code of Civil Procedure section 473, subdivision (b); that is, they require "both '""a satisfactory excuse for [the] default, and . . . diligence in making the motion after discovery of the default." [Citation.]' [Citation.]" (Schenkel, supra, at p. 4.) However, it did not hold that Code of Civil Procedure section 473.5 somehow incorporates the six-month outside limit of Code of Civil Procedure section 473, subdivision (b). As noted, Code of Civil Procedure section 473.5 has its own outside time limit, which is measured from written notice of entry, not from discovery of the default.

Page 13

Other Questions


Can a motion for relief be brought within a reasonable time? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for granting relief from default in cases of failure to file a timely notice of appeal? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's motion for relief from default and for leave to appeal that includes a statement of reasonable grounds and a certificate of probable cause denied? (California, United States of America)
What is the impact of a motion to amend a motion in the Superior Court of Appeal against a motion by a defendant who alleges that the motion was improperly adjourned? (California, United States of America)
Does a court's specification of reasons for granting a motion for a new trial, which does not state any grounds or reasons for the decision to grant the motion, constitute untimely and void? (California, United States of America)
What is the legal test for approval of a motion by the California Supreme Court on a motion to approve a motion for approval by the Court of Appeal? (California, United States of America)
Does a court have jurisdiction to issue both a motion and a motion for personal injury relief at the same time? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for 'within a reasonable time' to set aside a default and a judgment? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law supporting a motion for relief from default where the trial court refused to allow the appellant to present any evidence to refute the motion? (California, United States of America)
Is a plaintiff's timely motion under section 425.13 a timely motion? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.