California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Scott v. Silverado-Modjeska Recreation & Park Dist., G052929 (Cal. App. 2017):
3. The temporal proximity between her fall and her termination is not sufficient, at the final step of the burden-shifting analysis, to establish pretext. (Arteaga v. Brink's, Inc., supra, 163 Cal.App.4th at p. 353.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.