What is the legal test for disqualification of an attorney who represents a client with conflicting interests?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Jogani v. Jogani, B257750 (Cal. App. 2015):

client's right to rely on the confidentiality of communications with his or her former counsel. The rule in such cases is that disqualification of the attorney is required, but only if there is "'a "substantial relationship"'" between the former and the current representations, which gives rise to a presumption that confidential communications passed between them. (In re Charlisse C., supra, 45 Cal.4th at p. 161, quoting Flatt v. Superior Court (1994) 9 Cal.4th 275, 283.)

But the values at stake, and the standards for attorney disqualification, are different when there has been a concurrent representation of clients with conflicting interests. "In simultaneous representation cases, '[t]he primary value at stake . . . is the attorney's dutyand the client's legitimate expectationof loyalty, rather than confidentiality.'" (In re Charlisse C., supra, 45 Cal.4th at p. 160, quoting Flatt v. Superior Court, supra, 9 Cal.4th at p. 284.) The ethical duty not to disclose client confidences and the attorney-client evidentiary privilege both arise from the law's need to encourage clients to disclose to their attorneys all pertinent information, and the concomitant need to protect that disclosure. But the duty not to represent conflicting interests arises not just from the need for confidentiality of attorney-client communications, but also from the fiduciary nature of the attorney-client relationship itself. Clients repose confidence in their attorneys beyond merely engaging in confidential communications; they also rely on their attorney's continuing loyalty to their cause.

The rule against concurrent representation of conflicting interests therefore rests on both of these factors. Because conflicts threatening the duty of loyalty are so seriousand because the rules protecting attorney-client communications do not protect against violations of the duty of loyalty"'[w]ith few exceptions, disqualification [in a case of simultaneous representation] follows automatically,'" without any showing that the client's confidential communications are at risk. (In re Charlisse C., supra, 45 Cal.4th at p. 160, quoting People ex rel. Dept. of Corporations v. SpeeDee Oil Change Systems, Inc. (1999) 20 Cal.4th 1135, 1147.) "The principle precluding representing an interest adverse to those of a current client is based not on any concern with the

Page 19

Other Questions


What is the legal test for disqualification of an attorney who represents a client with conflicting interests? (California, United States of America)
Is a client's attorney required to repay all moneys laid out by the attorney to the attorney before the client can make a claim against the attorney? (California, United States of America)
Can an attorney who is sued for malpractice by a former client cross-complain for equitable indemnity against a successor attorney who has been hired to extricate the client from the condition created by the predecessor attorney? (California, United States of America)
Does an attorney need to represent a client in a civil action before that attorney's surprise can cause the entry of default against the client? (California, United States of America)
Is there any conflict of interest in the representation of a client who has previously been represented by the same attorney? (California, United States of America)
When will the District Attorney's interest in the case be considered a conflict of interest? (California, United States of America)
Is attorney-client privilege waived with respect to legal opinion and advice given to the client by counsel? (California, United States of America)
Can a client sue an attorney for malpractice arising from the representation in which the client was represented? (California, United States of America)
Is there a conflict of interest between a public attorney and a private attorney? (California, United States of America)
When an attorney's disregard for the client's interest is habitual, or is severe discipline imposed on an attorney who fails to render services? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.