The following excerpt is from United States v. O'Brien, 19-3895-cr (2nd Cir. 2021):
3. Although the district court concluded that the statutory language was not mandatory without consideration of the timeliness issue, we may affirm on any grounds for which there is sufficient support in the record. See Pollara v. Seymour, 344 F.3d 265, 268 (2d Cir. 2003).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.