California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Tran, 255 Cal.Rptr.3d 26, 42 Cal.App.5th 1 (Cal. App. 2019):
examining the totality of the circumstances [citation], ..." ( People v. Robinson (2010) 47 Cal.4th 1104, 1120, 104 Cal.Rptr.3d 727, 224 P.3d 55.) The burden is on the prosecution to provide some justification for the warrantless search or seizure. ( People v. Williams (1999) 20 Cal.4th 119, 136, 83 Cal.Rptr.2d 275, 973 P.2d 52.)
Here, we are not concerned with a search, but instead, a seizure. A seizure is "far less intrusive than a search." ( United States v. Payton (9th Cir. 2009) 573 F.3d 859, 863 ( Payton ).) Whereas a search implicates a person's right to keep the contents of his or her belongings private, a seizure only affects their right to possess the particular item in question. (
[255 Cal.Rptr.3d 32]
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.