What is the legal framework for our decision to grant a defense counsel to an indigent defendant?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Gardner v. Appellate Div. of the Superior Court, 245 Cal.Rptr.3d 58, 436 P.3d 946, 6 Cal.5th 998 (Cal. 2019):

Before turning to the merits, we address a threshold issue concerning the legal framework for our decision. In their initial briefing before this court, the parties focused on the scope of the right to counsel secured by the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. That amendment, which is binding on the states through the Fourteenth Amendment, gives an indigent defendant facing incarceration the right to court-appointed counsel for his or her defense. ( Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) 372 U.S. 335, 342343, 83 S.Ct. 792, 9 L.Ed.2d 799 ( Gideon ).)

Other Questions


When a defendant's request to represent himself was granted, when the trial court appointed a defense investigator, legal runner, and standby counsel, as well as granting pro. per. funds and telephone access, is he entitled to reversal? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a defendant's ability to object to a court's decision to grant a defense counsel fee? (California, United States of America)
Is a prosecutor's comment that defense counsel was seeking to "distract the jury from the evidence as an attack on counsel's integrity a fair response to defense counsel's remarks? (California, United States of America)
What is the legal test for a defense counsel to pursue an innocence defense rather than a voluntary intoxication defense? (California, United States of America)
Does the trial court erred by discussing some of defendant's complaints about defense counsel and disagreements with defense counsel in the presence of the prosecutor? (California, United States of America)
Can a prosecutor commit misconduct if he or she attacks the integrity of defense counsel or casts aspersions on defense counsel? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the court require a defense counsel to object to a motion where the trial atmosphere was poisonous, and the defense counsel did not object at all? (California, United States of America)
Does trial counsel shirk his constitutional responsibility to provide competent counsel by failing to ask the court to instruct on a bogus self-defense defense? (California, United States of America)
Can a prosecutor impugently call the integrity of defense counsel by asserting defense counsel would lose their bar cards if they argued in favor of voluntary manslaughter? (California, United States of America)
Can defense counsel argue that defense counsel failed to object to the foregoing procedure or request that written instructions be provided to the jury? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.