The following excerpt is from Koala v. Khosla, 931 F.3d 887 (9th Cir. 2019):
After laying out this basic framework, we emphasized that "motive [is] a necessary element" of a retaliation claim, id. at 866, and held that "[o]therwise lawful government action may nonetheless be unlawful if motivated by retaliation for having engaged in activity protected under the First Amendment." Id. at 869 (quoting OBrien v. Welty , 818 F.3d 920, 932 (9th Cir. 2016) ).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.