What is the law on how to instruct a jury on abstract principles of law?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Mills, 147 Cal.Rptr.3d 833, 286 P.3d 754, 55 Cal.4th 663 (Cal. 2012):

"It has long been the law that it is error to charge the jury on abstract principles of law not pertinent to the issues in the case. (People v. Roe (1922) 189 Cal. 548, 558 [209 P. 560].) The reason for the rule is obvious. Such an instruction tends to confuse and mislead the jury by injecting into the case matters which the undisputed evidence shows are not involved." (People v. Jackson (1954) 42 Cal.2d 540, 546547, 268 P.2d 6; see also, e.g.,

[55 Cal.4th 681]

Other Questions


What is the test for giving an instruction on the principle of 'pinpoint instruction' relating to particular evidence to an element of the crime? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have any authority or authority to instruct a jury to disregard an instruction in an assault case where the instruction had no antecedent in the facts? (California, United States of America)
Is there any instructional error in general criminal intent instruction used by the trial court to include counts 4 and 7 in the General Criminal intent instruction? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the jury be instructed to follow the law as instructed, rather than consider any comments by the prosecutor that conflicted with the trial court's instructions? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the instructions in the context of manslaughter instructions in cases where the instruction was limited or limited? (California, United States of America)
Does the instruction that the jury was to follow the instructions if an attorney's comments appeared to be in conflict with the instructions apply? (California, United States of America)
Does a jury have a duty to instruct sua sponte on the principles of law that are closely and openly connected with the facts before the jury? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a jury to be instructed on the general principles of law in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
Does a jury have a duty to instruct sua sponte on the principles of law that are closely and openly connected with the facts before the jury? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of discretion standard apply to a decision by the appellate court to instruct or not to instruct a jury? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.