What is the impact of the prosecutor's argument to the jury of a sexual assault trial on the victim's mental health?

The prosecutor also argued to the jury that "[w]hen you go home at the end of the day, that is your sanctuary. It has been a long day today, and I can't wait to get in the car to go home[,] to take off my [heels], relax. It is raining out. All you want to do is go home. You don't feel well, what do you want to do? You want to go home, but he stole that from them, and now home isn't safe." " 'It is, of course, improper to make arguments to the jury that give it the impression that "emotion may reign over reason," and to present "irrelevant information or inflammatory rhetoric that diverts the jury's attention from its proper role, or invites an irrational, purely subjective response." [Citation.]' [Citation.]" (People v. Redd (2010) 48 Cal.4th 691, 742.) "[A]n appeal for sympathy for the victim is out of place during an objective determination of guilt."

Page 20