California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Powell v. Superior Court, 232 Cal.App.3d 785, 283 Cal.Rptr. 777 (Cal. App. 1991):
"When a spectacular crime has aroused community attention and a suspect has been arrested, the possibility of an unfair trial may originate in widespread publicity describing facts, statements and circumstances which tend to create a belief in his guilt. [p] Indispensable to any morally acceptable system of criminal justice is a verdict based upon evidence and argument received in open court, not from outside sources. [Fn. omitted.] When community attention is focused upon the suspect of a spectacular crime, the news media's dissemination of incriminatory circumstances sharply threatens the integrity of the coming trial.... [p] The goal of a fair trial in the locality of the crime is practically unattainable when the jury panel has been bathed in streams of circumstantial incrimination flowing from the news media. [Fn. omitted.] ... An honest juror may admit knowledge or tentative prejudgment and find himself excluded. Many will sincerely try to set aside [232 Cal.App.3d 802] their preconceptions and give assurance of impartiality, yet unconsciously bend to the influence of initial impressions gained from the news media. [Fn. omitted.]" (Corona v. Superior Court (1972) 24 Cal.App.3d 872, 877, 101 Cal.Rptr. 411.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.