What is the impact of the Court's failure to state reasons for not imposing a restitution fine on appeal?

complain for the first time on appeal about the trial court's failure to state reasons for a sentencing choice, reasoning, inter alia, that "[r]outine defects in the court's statement of reasons are easily prevented and corrected if called to the court's attention." (Id. at p. 353; see People v. Tillman (2000) 22 Cal.4th 300, 302-303 [People forfeited its unpreserved challenge to court's failure to state reasons for not imposing restitution fine, a decision constituting discretionary sentencing choice].)