What is the impact of admitting expert testimony for abuse of abuse?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Dominguez, B232986 (Cal. App. 2012):

We review the court's decision to admit expert testimony for an abuse of discretion. (People v. Catlin (2001) 26 Cal.4th 81, 131.)

A. The CSAAS evidence was relevant to assess the victim's credibility.

Other Questions


In determining whether to admit expert testimony in a medical malpractice case, what is the test for admitting expert testimony? (California, United States of America)
In determining whether to admit expert testimony in a medical malpractice case, what is the test for admitting expert testimony? (California, United States of America)
What is the impact of a court's decision to admit expert testimony for abuse of abuse of power? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting expert testimony under abuse of the abuse standard? (California, United States of America)
What is the impact of an expert's testimony on sexual abuse? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting expert testimony in support of a claim of historical sexual abuse? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting expert testimony for abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting expert testimony for abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for abuse of abuse of the abuse of evidence in a criminal case where a defendant admitted to a prior burglary? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting expert testimony concerning child sexual abuse? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.