What is the impact of a trial court's de novo ruling?

When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)

Whether a court's ruling is based on oral testimony or written declarations, when conflicting inferences can reasonably be drawn from the facts, can the appellate court defer to the trial court's factual determinations? (California, United States of America)

Does the "right ruling, wrong reasoning" rule apply to an evidentiary ruling that required the trial court to make findings of fact? (California, United States of America)

How have courts reviewed a trial court's ruling on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)

Is a trial court ruling that resolves conflicts in the evidence entitled to greater deference from a reviewing court than a similar finding in a similar case? (California, United States of America)

How does the Court of Appeal review a trial court's ruling to admit evidence over defendant's objection based on evidence section 352? (California, United States of America)

What is the impact of a finding that the trial court's ruling that a defendant violated his right to freedom of speech? (California, United States of America)

Is a defendant entitled to a new trial if the trial court refuses to hear or rule on the motion? (California, United States of America)

When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)

What is the impact of a conclusion relied on by the trial court and challenged on appeal but not addressed by the appellate court? (California, United States of America)