The following excerpt is from Ingber v. Enzor, 841 F.2d 450 (2nd Cir. 1988):
1 Of course, the instant case is not concerned with retroactive application of new rules of criminal procedure which involves a different analysis. See, e.g., Griffith v. Kentucky, 479 U.S. 314, 107 S.Ct. 708, 93 L.Ed.2d 649 (1987). Because we consider the retroactive effect of a new rule of substantive law, the criminal procedure cases do not inform our decision here.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.